There are four essential insights that can reveal to you how the playing style of a specific player is. VP$IP Voluntarily Putting cash In the Pot – It is the % of times the player is in a pot. For instance, a 40% VPIP implies the player is in 40% of the pots. This estimates the detachment of a player pre-flop. If player calls 40% of the hands reflow, he is a free player and all things considered, he is a terrible player. For full-ring tables 10 players, a VP$IP of 10%-20% is viewed as tight. A VP$IP of 30% or more is extremely free. VPIP has another great use. Contrasting this with the reflow-raise we can get a smart thought of how a player plays his hands reflow. PFR Prelog raise – It is the % of times the player raises reflow. It is valuable to contrast this detail with VPIP.
Clearly, VPIP will consistently be higher or equivalent to PFR, on the grounds that VPIP checks calling and raising reflow. When there is a major distinction among VPIP and PFR for instance. VPIP = 20%, PFR=3% you can accept that you are managing a player that plays inactively reflow. At the point when the thing that matters is 4% or less for instance VPIP=20%, PFR=28%, and the VP$IP is in a standard worth range 15%-20% for full-ring, more for in need of help you can accept that you are playing against a tight-forceful player TAG, which are the dominoqq players who benefit the most on low and medium stakes. You ought to be a TAG yourself, it is more than demonstrated that it is the playing style that benefits the most, and works for low, medium and high stakes.
AF Aggression factor – It gauges the post-flop forcefulness of a player. It ought to consistently be contrasted with VP$IP. a player that is on numerous pots would not typically have a high AF, just on the grounds that multiple occasions that player will have garbage, and would not have a made hand or an attract to play with. This will disclose to you the amount you should regard a player’s wagers. For instance, a player with 20% VP$IP and 5 to 10 AF is viewed as a forceful player, and will typically make a continuation wager on you, and may attempt to feign in other spots. If that equivalent player had 0.5 AF, he was a latent player, so you ought to for the most part regard his wagers. A player with half VP$IP and 1 AF, taking a gander at the AF, looks detached. In any case, remember you need to take a gander at VPIP as well, and this player is obviously forceful on account of his high VPIP and 1 AF.